Why Is the Champions League Considered the Holy Grail of Club Football?
This week sees the return of Champions League football with
the fourth round of fixtures in the group stages set to take place
over the coming days. Some mouth-watering matches will be played from
Borussia
Dortmund facing off against a resurgent Arsenal to a clash between two
giants of the game when Juventus host Real Madrid. The eyes of the
footballing world will once again
turn towards the most prestigious competition in the world, but why is
winning the
Champions League considered the holy grail of club football?
Sir Alex Ferguson once said: “The Champions League is the
best competition in the world now, better than the World Cup, better
than the
European championships. It’s a fantastic tournament.” If arguably the
greatest
manager ever is giving the competition such high praise, then you have
to take
note. The Champions League consists of the best domestic teams from all
over Europe and to win the competition in its entirety is seen as the
pinnacle of
club football. Taking part in the European competition has many
advantages to it and just
qualifying for it is a huge attraction for potential players looking to
move clubs.
Take Gareth Bale as an example and his world-record transfer to Real
Madrid after Spurs missed out on Champions League qualification.
The money generated from partaking in the
Champions League in terms of TV revenue is also a huge factor. Many
clubs, such as Arsenal, rely on the safety net of the guaranteed income
as a result of
qualification to the competition. It’s highly unlikely that Mesut Ozil
would have
swapped the Santiago Bernabeu for the Emirates had they not managed to
qualify.
Similarly, you also have to question whether or not Arsene Wenger would
have
parted with the staggering £42.5 million had they not reached the group
stages.
In the quest to be crowned winners, the likelihood is that you are
going
to come up against a big club from either Spain, England, Italy or
Germany and this is why any eventual winner is held in such high regard.
Take Manchester United
when they were crowned winners in 2008, overcoming a group consisting of
Roma,
Sporting Lisbon and Dynamo Kyiv. In the latter rounds they knocked out
French
side Lyon before facing Roma again. In the semi-finals they overcame
Barcelona
before playing Chelsea in the final, prevailing on penalties.
Another
factor
worth taking into consideration is that teams in the Champions League
travel long distances to face off against sides with less than
impressive facilities and in unfamiliar surroundings. Teams travelling
to Turkish
side Galatasaray, for example, can expect a hostile atmosphere from the
home
support and visiting teams will often settle for a draw when playing at
the
Turk Telekom Arena. The top teams in the competition will be used to
playing in state
of the art stadiums and performing on world class pitches, but certain
teams will not possess the same level of facilities. Whilst the bigger
teams are expected to beat the smaller clubs, the pitch conditions can
often
play a part in shock defeats. As such, these away games can make the
Champions League very difficult, which adds to its reputation as the one
trophy really worth winning.
However,
the flip side of the argument is that winning a league title is bigger
than the
Champions League. Take the Premier League for example, whereby all 20
clubs
have to play a minimum of 38 games. Factor in cup competitions and teams
could
well feature in over 45 games and this will test a squad's depth and
endurance to breaking point. Winning a
league requires a consistent level of good form over a number of months
and against a variety of opponents. As such, some would argue that this
make its harder to win than the Champions League and is therefore more
prestigous.
0 comments